Semantic Search
An Architect's Guide to
Image Embeddings & Deployment
The efficacy of a semantic search system is determined by its architecture. This interactive guide analyzes the shift from CNNs to Vision Transformers, evaluates SOTA models like DINOv2 and CLIP, and provides a framework for scalable vector deployment.
I. The Architectural Divide
The field is defined by a split between CNNs (ResNet, EfficientNet), which rely on strong "inductive biases" like locality, and Vision Transformers (ViTs), which favor global context and massive data scale. While CNNs excel with limited data, ViTs dominate when data is abundant, treating images as sequences of patches to capture long-range dependencies.
💡 Key Takeaway
The ViT era shifts the burden from architecture engineering (designing clever filters) to data engineering. Success now depends on the scale and curation of the training dataset (e.g., LVD-142M).
Architecture Profile Analysis
II. The Engine of Similarity
A backbone is useless without a structured vector space. Deep Metric Learning (DML) shapes this space. Explore how loss functions evolved from simple Euclidean distance to Geodesic optimization on a hypersphere.
III. Visual vs. Conceptual
The SOTA landscape is divided between Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) and Multimodal Learning. DINOv2 (SSL) acts as a "visual cortex," excelling at pure pixel-level understanding. CLIP (Multimodal) learns "meaning" through language, enabling zero-shot capabilities.
-
A
DINOv2 (ViT-L/G):
Best for "Find similar looking images". 768-dim embeddings. Higher storage cost.
-
B
CLIP / MetaCLIP:
Best for "Find images matching this text". 512-dim embeddings. Lower visual precision.
Performance Profile Comparison
Relative performance scale based on benchmark trends (visual vs. semantic tasks).
Build Your Architecture
Define your constraints to generate a recommended stack (Model + Training Strategy + Vector DB).
Configure inputs and click Generate to see your architectural blueprint.